Sucralose vs Maltodextrin

Side-by-side comparison of safety, regulations, and usage.

Caution E955

Sucralose

Sweetener

600x sweeter than sugar. Made from sugar

USApproved

EUApproved

UKSame as EU pre-Brexit

JapanApproved

Safe

Maltodextrin

Bulking Agent

Starch-derived carbohydrate. Not classified as additive (food ingredient). High glycemic index. Very common filler in processed foods and supplements

USApproved

EUApproved

UKSame as EU

JapanCheck MHLW

Feature	Sucralose	Maltodextrin
Safety Rating	Caution	Safe
Category	Sweetener	Bulking Agent
E-Number	E955	N/A
Banned Somewhere?	No	No
Controversy	medium	low
US Status	Approved	Approved
EU Status	Approved	Approved

Quick Verdict

Based on current evidence, Maltodextrin appears to be the safer choice with a "Safe" rating compared to Sucralose's "Caution" rating. However, individual circumstances vary. Always consult healthcare professionals for personalized dietary advice.

More Comparisons

Aspartame vs Sucralose Stevia vs Aspartame BHA vs BHT Carrageenan vs Guar Gum Xylitol vs Erythritol

Share: X Facebook Pinterest WhatsApp

See an error? Report it